(a)
|
God and Christ were acting in concert in the great
"transaction" of human redemption -- for the "buyer" may be either God or His
Son! In the New Testament both are referred to as "Savior". "God was reconciling
the world to himself in Christ" (2Co 5:19). There was no difference between the
motives of the One and the motives of the other; they were together. The old man
Abraham and his son Isaac, who "went together" to the altar on Moriah (Gen
22:6,8), are the express pattern of the Heavenly Father and His Son who,
together, go to the cross! (Notice how Paul in Rom 8:31,32 quotes Gen 22:12; and
how, incidentally, Abraham -- a man -- actually typifies the
Almighty!)
|
|
|
(b)
|
The "all" that are redeemed are in fact not "all" in the
absolute sense. The element of freewill, or choice, or faith, must be taken into
account: a man must want to be redeemed before God and Christ will redeem
him!
|
|
|
(c)
|
Whereas popular or "orthodox" theology would say,
unequivocally, that men are redeemed by Christ from the "devil", the passages
above tell us that -- Biblically speaking -- man is redeemed from... iniquity,
wickedness, transgressions, the earth, and all men and nations. The interesting
point here is that these things are -- in point of fact -- the perfect Biblical
definition, broadly and generally, of the "devil"!
|
|
|
(d)
|
Man was also redeemed from the Law of Moses, and from the
"curse" of that Law -- not because the Law itself was evil (it was certainly
not: Rom 7:12-14), but because the Law brought into focus and highlighted man's
sin.
|
|
|
(e)
|
In this context, the "blood", the "life", and the "death" of
Christ are in some sense synonymous terms; each is the "price" paid to "buy" us
from sin and the world. The combination and repetition of these terms in this
study suggest that no single term should stand alone -- but each ought to be
modified, and defined, by the others: (1)We are not redeemed by Christ's blood
alone. Christ's blood was not meaningful as blood alone: there was nothing
magical or potent in his blood above that of any other man's. However, his blood
was required -- and not that of any animal, or any other man for that matter --
because of the sinless life that he lived. (2) Even Christ's perfect life, the
absolute giving of himself to the Father's will day by day, would not have been
a sufficient "redemption" price: the wisdom and purpose of God required that His
Son die -- willingly and obediently -- in the prescribed manner. (3) Similarly,
had Christ died a different kind of death, it would not have been acceptable as
a sacrifice for sins.
|
|
|
(f)
|
Thus the death required was a sacrificial death, requiring
bloodshed, on the pattern of the Passover Lamb (1Pe 1:18,19).
|
|
|
(g)
|
And finally, and most remarkably, an overview of the four
"parts" of the "transaction" demonstrates that... Christ gave himself for
himself: he was at the same time three of the four "parties": he was the buyer,
the price paid, and that which was purchased! In this he was the first and
preeminent example of his own words:
|
|
|
|
"If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take
up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but
whoever loses his life for me will find it. What good will it be for a man if he
gains the whole world, yet forfeits his soul [or life, the same word]? Or what
can a man give in exchange for his soul [or life]?" (Mat 16:24-26).
|
|
|
|
He redeemed, or bought, himself from the power of sin and the
world because he gave himself up, utterly and wholeheartedly, to do the will of
his Father. He lost his life to save his life, and -- not incidentally -- to
save the lives of all who in faith follow his example.
|