| 1.
 | There is no apology for the marked Old Testament emphasis
                here, for it becomes more and more evident that the Gospels, shot through with
                allusions to the older Scriptures, demand to be interpreted in the light of
                them. "New Testament Christianity" is a religion of ignorance. 
 | 
        
            | 2. 
 | References to various authorities on the Gospels are few. Had
                I been systematic in this, the book would have been overloaded with a mass of
                references of the sort most readers have no use for. 
 | 
        
            | 3. 
 | Also, the original copious footnotes have been resolutely
                eliminated. To some extent the notes at the end of each chapter have taken over
                their function. But for the most part those notes consist of additional details
                of the sort that students may appreciate and which stubbornly refuse to blend
                into the main text. 
 | 
        
            | 4. 
 | Even so, the body of the text has a fair number of extra Bible
                references (useful, I hope) and parenthetic additions. If to some extent these
                make for less smooth reading, I apologize. It was difficult to know what else to
                do with them. 
 | 
        
            | 5. 
 | Inevitably, repetitions of ideas and emphasis will be found to
                crop up from time to time. In the first draft they grew like weeds. Even now, in
                spite of ruthless excision, some still survive. 
 | 
        
            | 6. 
 | The original volume (1 st edition) stopped short at the burial
                of our Lord. That was a bad mistake on my part. Of course these Studies should
                have run on to the very end of the Gospels. Now they do, through the
                incorporation of my book: "He is risen indeed", largely re-written. 
 | 
        
            | 7. 
 | The order of the Studies is approximately that followed by any
                standard Harmony of the Gospels. 
 | 
        
            | 8. 
 | The mystery of both double and single quote marks calls for
                explanation. As far as possible the former are used for exact quotation of Bible
                text. The latter come in where there has been an attempt at paraphrase (and, now
                and then, at imagining what might have been said). 
 | 
        
            | 9. 
 | But it is necessary to say that, in spite of some appearance
                to the contrary, use of imagination in re-constructing Gospel scenes has been
                very sparing. A big proportion of what might seem to be based on imagination is
                actually there in the Gospel text. In some places there is inference with a high
                degree of probability. 
 | 
        
            | 10. 
 | It is not to be hoped that complete freedom from error in
                interpretation has been achieved. A note to the author about any serious mistake
                would be appreciated. 
 | 
        
            | 11. 
 | These Studies have also been tape-recorded by the author (not
                very efficiently, I fear) and are available from: 
 | 
        
            | 
 | The Williamsburg Foundation, 1620 Lititz Pike, Lancaster. Pa,
                USA 17601. 
 | 
        
            | 12. 
 | It is not possible to set down here at all adequately my
                degree of indebtedness to a wide circle of good friends. But it would be
                churlish not to mention gratefully: 
 
                    my wife and her unflagging enthusiasm for these
                        written studies, and for the tape-recorded
                        version.
                    the noble army of typists (one of them
                        especially) who did such splendid copying, and without a single
                        grumble.
                    another noble army of well-wishers whose
                        encouragement suggests a greater confidence in this undertaking than my
                        own.
                    a certain out-size enthusiast whose
                        optimistic bullying chivvied me, and whose faith shamed me, into undertaking
                        what I had decided was a quite impracticable
                        project.
                    the incredible patience and good temper
                        of my printer. To all of these, thanks, thanks indeed
                 | 
    
    
    And now I trust that I may, without presumption, consign to
    the care and blessing of the Lord Jesus this sustained attempt to get to know
    Him better and to bring Him more intimately into the lives of others.
        
            | 1.
 | These Studies are by no means all on the same level of
                readability. Where the going is deemed to be rather easier there is an asterisk
                at the heading. The general reader (and perhaps the more diligent student also?)
                will probably prefer to concentrate on these first, omitting also all the
                end-of-chapter notes. Then after a while, a complete re-read. 
 | 
        
            | 2. 
 | Perhaps eventually time will be found to work systematically
                through the volume once again, this time giving attention to the notes as well
                and also following up the references. 
 | 
        
            | 3. 
 | Others will be content to use the book simply as a work of
                reference, going as occasion requires to this section or that. The list of
                Contents pp VII-XII (and, failing that, the Index) should help such to find
                fairly readily what they are after. 
 | 
        
            | 4. 
 | Will all readers please get accustomed to two standard
                abbreviations, which crop up frequently: 
 
                    LXX means, of course, the Septuagint Greek
                        Version of the Old Testament — indispensable!
                    s.w. means "same word" — it is an
                        abbreviation good Bible students can do without.
                 |