"Homoioma" (likeness)
The Greek word "homoioma" [likeness] plays an important role
in the statements about Christ in Rom and Phi -- in expressing both the
"divinity" and the humanity of the Son of God.
- Rom 5:14 asserts that mankind as a whole, like Adam, has been subjected to
the rule of death, even if it has not sinned in exactly the same way as he (epi
tou homoiomati). Adam is the type of Christ, the Last Adam (cf 1Co 15:45). What
Christ brings about by grace surpasses by far the equivalent effect of the fall
of the first man.
- Rom 6:5 presents certain difficulties of exegesis: "For if
we have been united with him in a death like his [tou homoiomati tou thanatou
autou], we shall certainly be united in a resurrection like his" (RSV). The
interpretation depends on whether one understands "homoioma" in this verse
concretely as a picture, the symbolic representation of something else (ie
baptism as representing something else), or as the actual realization of an
event by means of a symbolic representation (ie, in some real and meaningful
sense, believers "die" when baptized into Christ). If one prefers the second
alternative, the text would mean: "In the act of baptism the death of Jesus
Christ is present, although in a different form from that on Golgotha," and we
are "received into the same saving event"... (NIDNTT)
- Rom 8:3: "What the
law, weakened by the flesh, could not do: God... sending his own Son in the
likeness of sinful flesh [en homoiomati sarkos hamartias] and for sin...
condemned sin in the flesh" (RSV). Here is Christ being born, and thus coming,
into the very arena of human nature, because it was only there -- in that arena
-- that he could confront the power of sin (or the "devil": Heb 2:14,15) and
defeat it along the lines and on the terms intended by the Father. Did Jesus
then come in the ABSOLUTE IDENTITY of sinful flesh? Yes, and no. Yes, as to the
substance of that body which he possessed. But perhaps... No, as to that body
and flesh being "sinful" -- his flesh was not "sinful" in the sense of sinning
or having sinned. However, this requires a further caveat: the flesh, or the
body, of Jesus may be said to have been "sinful" in the sense that -- as the
principle of that flesh operated in other human beings -- it led inevitably to
actual sin... metonymical "sin". And so God made him, Jesus, to be "sin" (in his
sinful flesh), even though Jesus knew no sin (actually, by commission): 2Co
5:19-21.
- Similarly in Phi 2:7, Jesus is described as "being born in the
likeness of men [en homoiomati anthropon genomenos]" (RSV). He was conceived in
human form, and became like man. This "likeness" was real and not merely
apparent. What has already been said about Rom. 8:3 applies here unequivocally.
Christ was in fact conceived as a historically unique, unambiguously human
being. He was in fact delivered to death, the curse of sinful men (cf Gal 3:13),
although he himself was sinless (cf Heb 4:15). Thus at a specific point in time,
and in a specific arena, or body (ie, "in his flesh"), he broke the power of sin
and death.