5. Elijah
    
    In a familiar prophecy about the coming of
    Christ, there is this explicit detail: "I will send you Elijah the prophet
    before the coming of the great and terrible day of the Lord" (Mal. 4:5
    RV).
    
    There are those who maintain that this prophecy
    was fulfilled in John the Baptist. In this they are right. Luke 1: 17, Mt.17: 12
    say so. But they are not wholly right, for Jesus also said: "Elias truly shall
    first come, and restore (Gk. future tense) all things" (Mt. 17:11). John had
    certainly been beheaded when these words were spoken. So the conclusion is
    hardly to be avoided that the Lord looked for a further and more complete
    fulfilment of the Malachi prophecy. This is the more certain since John did not
    "turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to
    their fathers", for more than once Jesus declared John's mission to be a
    failure, Lk. 7: 33; Mt. 11: 12. Also, ghastly as were the experiences of A.D. 70
    that was not “the great and terrible day of the Lord”, for, as later
    chapters here will establish, there are much worse sufferings in store for the
    holy Land and its holy City.
    
    This Last-Day fulfilment of the Elijah prophecy
    (not necessarily by Elijah himself or by John the Baptist, but by an Elijah-like
    prophet) helps towards a solution of a somewhat distressing
    problem.
    
    A good deal of intense expectancy has centred
    round the year of 1988. The chain of reasoning goes thus:
    
    
        -  "This generation (which witnesses the blossoming of the fig
            tree) shall not pass till all these things be fulfilled"
            (Mt.24:34).
        
 -  The N.T. speaks of a generation as a period
            of forty years (Heb. 3:9,10; Mt. 23:36).
        
 -  The beginning
            of this end-time generation can be fairly confidently identified with 1948, the
            inauguration of the independent state of Israel.
        
 -  Then
            ought not the Lord's coming to be expected in
            1988?
    
 
    This may seem water-tight, but it isn't - for two
    very good reasons:
    
    
        -  Chapter 4 here has provided copious Bible evidence for
            believing that a necessary pre-condition for the Lord's return is that there be
            repentance in Israel - some sign of "fruit" on the Israeli fig-tree; it was
            because he found no fruit on it that he abandoned it to its fate (Mt. 21:19,20).
            Yet in spite of what that chapter has added, can it be said that the year of
            grace 1988 has manifested real fruit for God?
        
 -  The
            repentance, which God seeks in His Israel, He also seeks with at least equal
            eagerness in His New Israel - and here the same doubt exists. True, prayers are
            endlessly offered for the Second Coming. A certain academic interest persists.
            But if the "servants" were eager and watchful, would they show such enthusiasm
            for the affluent life in which this decadent twentieth century so readily
            schools them? Would they be content with studies in Bible prophecy which have
            advanced their understanding hardly at all since 1870? Now, in ancient days when
            natural Israel displayed no enthusiasm for their Land of Promise, with brusque
            divine indignation they were packed off back into the wilderness for a further
            forty (39?) years. There are lots of examples of this divine reaction to human
            faithlessness. It would be strange, surely, if the New Israel of today were to
            be immune from the same kind of deserved disappointment. Our Lord said
            concerning the horrors of A.D. 70: "For the elect's sake those days shall be
            shortened (made shorter)" (Mt. 24: 22). Could it be that now, for the
            unfaithfuls' sake (Num. 14: 33,34) these days will be lengthened instead
            of shortened?
    
 
    There is also this consideration, Jesus said
    quite specifically that the tribulation period in Elijah's ministry was
    precisely "three years and six months" (Lk. 4: 25; Jas. 5: 17), yet this exact
    period is not to be found in the Books of Kings. Then where did Jesus get it
    from?
    
    The only place in the O.T. where this precise
    period is to be found is in the Book of Daniel, and of the three occurrences
    there, one is outstandingly clear as to its reference: "when he shall have
    accomplished to scatter the power of the holy people, all these things shall be
    finished" (12: 7).
    
    If Jesus quarried his 3½ years from Daniel
    (and used it over again in Rev. 12: 14; 13: 5; 11: 3,11) in a very similar
    context, then may it not be inferred that the Last Day Elijah (who may be even
    now living quietly in some obscure kibbutz in Israel) will be raised up in the
    last imminent years of Israel's tribulation to turn the heart of the fathers of
    the nation to be as receptive as children, and to turn the heart of the children
    (wayward heedless Israel) to their Fathers (Abraham, Isaac and
    Jacob)?
    
    If so, is it possible to pin-point the beginning
    of this climactic 3½ years? For suggestion regarding this, see chapter
    9.