2. Guide Lines
    
    It is desirable at the outset to underline the
    importance of a few general principles, which it would be unwise to
    overlook.
    
    First, Bible prophecy is not human history
    written in advance; it is Israel's history written in advance. Israel is
    the very centre of God's developing purpose. Bible prophecy centres on God's
    People. Of course there are remarkable events foretold concerning other nations,
    but these come only when such nations as Egypt, Babylon, Edom, Russia
    make significant impact on Israel. Even in such a familiar prophecy as
    Nebuchadnezzar's image this stands true. Why should the revelation of great
    empires stop short with Babylon, Persia’ Greece, and Rome? Why not Genghiz
    Khan, Napoleon, Philipi ll of Spain? And, far and away the greatest of them all,
    the British Empire?
    
    But once it is realised that a Hebrew prophet
    wrote Daniel 2, about nations, which oppressed his people in their own, Land,
    there is no difficulty. 
    
    Various details chime in with this
    view.
    
    The Fourth Empire was to "break in pieces and
    crush". But is it not true that all empires do this? No! Rome took the
    blessings of peace and settled government to every people it conquered but could
    not achieve this with the turbulent Jews; so in AD 70 and 135 the only answer to
    such insurgence was to smash and scatter. Then the sequence of empires in the
    prophetic vision came to an end until, today, Jews are back in their own
        Land, and appropriately at that point the vision resumes with details about
    ten nations which will yet overpower the State of Israel, themselves being
    smashed by the Stone: "they (the Jews) shall mingle (Aram: shall arab)
    themselves with the seed of men."
    
    The history of interpretation of these ten
    nations is interesting:
    
    1848, in Elpis Israel (p. 326): 
    
    1. Belgium; 2. France; 3. Spain; 4. Portugal; 5.
    Naples; 6. Sardinia; 7. Greece; 8. Hungary; 9. Lombardy; 10.
    Bavaria. 
    
    1924, C. C. W.'s correction of this list (p.
    327):
    
    1. Belgium; 2. France; 3.Spain; 4. Portugal; 5.
    Switzerland; 6. Germany; 7. Italy; 8. Austria-Hungary; 9. Serbia; 10.
    Greece.
    
    1868: The ten toe-kingdoms (and the ten horns)
    "have yet (in 1868!) to be formed out of the existing elements"
    (Exposition of Daniel, J. T. p.13).
    
    Here is another interesting example of great men
    re-adjusting their prophetic perspective (it does not happen regarding
    doctrine nor can it). 
    
    Second, the temptation to interpret prophecies by
    finding resemblances to current events and newspaper comments thereon is to be
    resisted. Always there must be first of all a well established Biblical
    foundation for the main line of interpretation, and then the excitement
    of matching Bible detail with recent history, or current events, may proceed. To
    equate the Sixth Seal with the times of Constantine or the Two Witnesses with
    the Huguenots because such identifications help to fill out attractive
    historical theory is perilous going. Let the student first find the copious
    Biblical allusions squandered through those passages and gratefully use the
    hints, which they supply, and there is then no need to depend on a ruthless and
    highly subjective plundering of the history books.
    
    Let it be noted also that much of this European
    history was first suggested by Protestant commentators, who were themselves
    reared on the errors of the “harlot daughters". This is a fact readily
    substantiated.
    
    Thirdly, and in harmony with what has just been
    said, it needs to be remembered that practically all Old Testament (and N. T.?)
    prophecy has the same kind of tidy framework, thus: The prophecy you are
    interested in had a primary reference contemporary with or immediately after the
    prophet's own day; but after this there is a duty to look for a Messianic
    reference to either the First or the Second Coming of the Lord. Furthermore,
    these two facets should harmonize; e.g. God's great Promise to David was
    fulfilled in Solomon and in Christ - there is Bible evidence for both;
    that matchless prophecy in Isaiah 53 was written about good king Hezekiah and
    about the sufferings of our Lord-and again there is Bible evidence for
    both.
    
    In the chapters, which follow from here, only the
    Messianic eschatological phase of each prophecy will be taken into
    account.